 In This Article:
I’ve never heard people talk about their energy bills as much as they have this summer.
“$350.” “$460.” “$1,300! I never should have put in that damn pool.” It’s top of mind because people genuinely can’t believe what they’re seeing. They’re running to their neighbors just for sanity checks: “This can’t be right... right!?” Granted, it’s been a hot summer and running the A/C has never been cheap. Still, the sticker shock on energy bills is a worrisome subject for virtually everybody. From utilities to home and auto insurance, structural living costs have skyrocketed over the last several years with little relief in sight. So far, people have mostly managed to stay afloat -- propped up by record asset prices and an exorbitant amount of debt. Beneath the surface, though, American households are starting to run on fumes. Cash flows are stretched thin, and budgets are breaking under the weight of bills people never explicitly chose to increase.
0 Comments
When supporting an adult child crosses the line into enabling, and how to offer targeted support to build true independence while also protecting your future.
For decades, the financial blueprint of parenting was clear: you build a solid foundation, watch your kids step onto it, and eventually hand over the keys to their own independence. Today, that blueprint is getting turned on its head. It is now more common than ever for an adult child to need a helping hand in life. According to a recent survey by Northwestern Mutual¹, a huge chunk of the population says they rely on their parents for money, including: • 72% of Gen Z (29 and younger) • 53% of millennials • 33% of Generation X Every parent wants to set their kids up for success. But as you balance that instinct with your own life goals (retirement, supporting parents, increasing standard of living, etc…), one question becomes incredibly important: is my support building an independent foundation or masking a developmental deficit? After a lifetime of employment, you’ve earned the financial freedom you worked so hard for. Protecting your financial independence is the foundation that keeps the whole family secure.
Why stressing over ‘Do I Have Enough’ leaves retirees vulnerable on health, identity, and social connection.
When I ask people if they’re ready for retirement, they almost always assume I’m asking about money. They tell me about reaching 'their number,' shifting to a conservative asset allocation, or refining their withdrawal strategy.
What I actually want to know is whether they are truly ready for the life waiting on the other side of work. That question is usually much harder for them to answer. In a survey of 9,000 adults across the US and Canada, Edward Jones and Age Wave examined what actually makes for a successful and happy retirement. They landed on a four-part framework: health, family, purpose, and finances.¹ Money is just one pillar out of four, yet it absorbs nearly all our retirement planning energy -- even though close to a third of new retirees in that same study reported struggling to find a sense of purpose once their job disappeared. "Can I retire?" is really two separate questions hiding under one umbrella: Having A Plan Means Knowing What To Do When the Paychecks Stop.  Article Highlights
I'd say retiring early, in some fashion, is a widespread goal of the American labor force. Hell, it's mine too: coffee in hand, the scent of pine, a sunrise morning somewhere in the mountains, sometime before 60 I hope.
That's the dream, financial freedom, the ability to do whatever you want whenever you want. Who wouldn't take that? But for the millions of Americans chasing it, success in retirement is impossible without a good plan. So many hinge that plan on a 401(k), an IRA, and Social Security, when in reality, they aren’t enough. To tell you the truth, odds are slim that any of us actually gets to choose our own retirement date. And if we don't get to choose, we're being forced out of the workforce for exogenous reasons, not because we decided the time was right. So what happens on the day the paychecks actually stop? The 401(k), the IRA, Social Security: these are real answers to a real question, which is how did you save. They don't answer the question that decides whether your retirement works or not. How much of that money you can safely spend, in what order you draw it down, and what happens if you don't get to pick when it starts are the much more important retirement questions. We judge ourselves by our intentions and everyone else by their actions. To find out what you truly value, look no further than the intersection of money and time.  Ask me who I am and I'll talk about a list of intentions. I value my physical health. I love being in the mountains. I like giving back to my community. These are some all true things about me. But this describes the person I want to become more than the person I actually am. I rarely make it to the gym these days (although having a 5-month old may have something to do with that). The closest mountains are hours away and I don't have the time to visit them. I spend a lot more time helping retirees who have built up a significant nest egg than with pro bono clients who could seriously use my help. There is a name for the mechanism behind this divergence. It's called the fundamental attribution error: a cognitive bias that says we judge other people by their actions and ourselves by our intentions. If a coworker misses a deadline, it’s because they’re disorganized. But if you miss one, it’s because the week got away from you when you truly meant to finish. We extend ourselves a courtesy pass based on our good intentions while judging everyone else strictly on their results. But what happens when you judge yourself strictly on your results? The question gets uncomfortable: Do you actually value what you think you value?
Economic mobility has fallen from a near-certainty to a coin flip, and half the country says the American Dream is out of reach. Is the path to prosperity still open?
Ratatouille is one of my favorite Pixar films. Never mind the masterpiece of a plot, I want to focus on the film's ultimate thesis: "anyone can cook," a line the culinary world treated as a punchline.
Ultimately, bitter critic Anton Ego, who originally sneered at Chef Gusteau for this proclamation, concludes that he finally understands what Gusteau meant: not everyone can become a great artist, but a great artist can come from anywhere. [scene] In the same fashion, people have spent nearly a century misinterpreting "the American Dream" motto. When historian James Truslow Adams coined the phrase in 1931, he described "that dream of a land in which life should be better and richer and fuller for every man..." People who quote Adams often stop there, and by that impossible standard, the promise of the American Dream fails spectacularly across every generation. But Adams's sentence kept going: "…with opportunity for each according to his ability or achievement," open to all "regardless of the fortuitous circumstances of birth or position." The American Dream is not a structural warranty that every citizen ends up wealthy. Its promise is far narrower in nature: that eligibility is not limited before you apply. Today, many people view the American Dream as completely out of reach, and for some of them it will be. But that was always the deal. It is for anyone, not everyone. This leaves us with two critical questions: Is the American Dream still reachable for anyone? Or are the structural barriers for some too massive to overcome? To find out, we have to look at the data.  Article Highlights:
In May, CNBC and SurveyMonkey asked 4,130 American adults about the American Dream.¹ Within the data lies a gender gap that I feel deserves more attention than it has received.
Among Gen Z respondents who haven't married, 38% of men say getting married is completely within reach. Among women, 24%. Asked whether they even want to marry, 22% of Gen Z women say no, double the rate of the men. On children, the distance widens: 29% of women say they're not interested, against 17% of men. The harsh explanations and broad generalizations always arrive quickly whenever news outlets discuss the deteriorating popularity of marriage. "Dating apps broke everyone." "Nobody is socializing and meeting each other anymore." " Modern culture toxicized men." "The economy broke everything." The list goes on… I have no real interest in relitigating any of the above statements. Instead, the result I find much more compelling is the consistent, double-digit gap between young men and young women on the topic of marriage and family. I think there is a simple but fascinating explanation: the two groups are looking at the same marriage decision and seeing wildly different future outcomes. The price tag associated with getting married and starting a family is inherently different for men and women -- and this new generation of women may be the first in history to calculate the cost accurately before deciding to pay it. Article Summary: Financial media always tells us to "stay the course" when we're nervous about our money, but it doesn't always help ease our anxiety. This article walks through a three-step framework -- borrowed from a surprising source in child psychology -- for talking yourself through market anxiety: anchor to what hasn't changed, name what's actually making you nervous, then return to the plan that was built for exactly this moment.  Psychology professionals lay out a surprisingly useful roadmap for parents to follow when their children become anxious and fearful in life.
Start with what you know. Acknowledge what's uncertain. Return to what you know. This 3-step framework was designed to help parents keep their kids emotionally regulated when things are falling apart, but the mechanics translate to investor anxiety almost perfectly. A conversation with yourself that follows this same sequence has a much better shot at calming your nerves about the market than one that skips straight to reassurance alone.  Article Summary: Despite a statistically better long-term performance record than men, women tend to worry about money more. That combination sounds contradictory until you look at what women are actually up against: a longer lifespan to fund, more career interruptions, lower lifetime earnings, and a wealth management industry built around someone else's financial life. The anxiety starts to make a lot more sense once you do the math. If you look at the cold, hard data, women make great long-term investors. Multiple massive datasets confirm it: they trade less, follow the plan, and routinely outperform men over the long run.
Yet, when surveying a general audience of women about how they feel about their financial future, the answers rarely invoke confidence. Instead, women report significantly higher financial anxiety, worry more about outliving their savings, and are far less likely to even call themselves "investors."¹ Why does this paradox exist? The answer: women aren't "lacking confidence"; instead, they are accurately calculating a much more difficult economic problem. To bridge this gap, we have to look past standard industry narratives and examine exactly why superior performance and heightened anxiety coexist -- and why acknowledging this paradox is the key to fixing the system.  In This Article:
Somewhere in your early-to-mid 40s, a particular kind of exhaustion hits. You've been running at full capacity for so long that the tiredness makes you numb. Not only numb to the pace, but somewhere along the way, numb to the decisions you stopped making for yourself.
Often, days start to look something like this: you handle a work crisis before 9am, field a call from your kid's school, schedule a follow-up for your dad's latest medical issue, have a quick text exchange with your mutually hardworking spouse about who's covering pickup, get back to the work crisis, and then realize it's 4pm and you haven't eaten. You fix one problem and three more surface. You get through the week and the next week is identical. There's no slow period coming, this is just the pace of life now. Hidden Fees, Anyone? High-Deductible Health Plans and the Shifting Burden of American Healthcare6/9/2026  Article Highlights:
We are living through a slow-motion shift in how Americans pay for healthcare. More and more people are choosing high-deductible health plans (HDHP) as the source of their health insurance. Nearly 4 in 10 people on the ACA marketplace are in one now, up from 3 in 10 just a year ago.¹ In the employer market, over 40 million people are enrolled, a share that has nearly quadrupled in two decades.²
Normal financial advice tells us that skipping the bar tab saves money, but it may be costing us in mental health over the long run.  A new survey from the American Psychiatric Association found that 54% of adults cope with loneliness by watching TV, movies, or online videos. Another 54% listen to music. Thirty-eight percent turn to social media. All of these come under a thread of emotional regulation, ways of numbing discomfort without confronting it.¹
While Americans continue to retreat from social life, they're also paying for the privilege of doing so. Many households are pushing past $100 a month in digital media subscriptions. Meanwhile, the number of adults who say they drink alcohol has fallen to 54%, the lowest rate in nearly 90 years according to a 2025 Gallup poll.² Gen Z drinks roughly 20% less than millennials did at the same age.³ Honestly, on paper, this looks like progress. Less money on alcohol and nights out = more money in the bank. But the trend is signaling something far more worrisome: the migration from social spending to isolation spending costs an enormous amount in mental health. Happy Money Series Part 4 | How to Spend Well and Enjoy Your Money More  "First round's on me!"
It is one of the most universal phrases in adult life. It represents a small celebration, a way of saying I am glad we are here. Often, it's a fight between friends to put a card down for a round. Typically, our brains flinch at an $80 charge. In this scenario however, it feels like the money is well spent. Why? Because that bill carries much more weight than just the $80 paper value. Happy Money Series | How to Spend Well and Enjoy Your Money More  Every Saturday afternoon through my high school years, I mowed the lawn at my childhood home. Week after week, I'd push that mower around in the SoCal heat, across the multiple grass areas in the front and back yard. All in all, the job took a grueling hour and a half.
Now I live in a house with a much smaller, but still reasonably sized, patch of grass. Ask me if I mow it myself. Heck no. The way I see it, I pay for lawn care one way or another. I either a) pay money for someone else to do it, or b) pay with my time and suffer through the dread of a chore I can't stand. For most people, option b) is the default. We grind through the chores we can't stand because outsourcing them feels lazy, or because we figure the money is better spent on almost anything else. It rarely registers as a financial decision at all. As it turns out, behavioral finance research says otherwise. Happy Money Series | How to Spend Well and Enjoy Your Money More  In the winter of 2025, after five years of 'we should really do this,' my friends and I boarded a flight to Hokkaido, Japan. We were going to experience "Japow", the legendary powder snow that has made Hokkaido one of the most coveted ski destinations on the planet.
If you're not familiar, many ski resorts in Hokkaido (the north island in Japan) receive well over 500 inches of snowfall in any given winter. It's one of the snowiest places in the world, and we had been waiting years to finally ski it firsthand. The planning phase of this trip alone was a rewarding process; locking down the tour company, mapping out resorts, researching restaurants, building a loose itinerary for Tokyo and Kyoto. Months of excitement and anticipation materialized on a shared google doc, building toward our January departure date. Then, in the week before we left, a dry spell appeared in the forecast. We weren't too worried… a few days without fresh snow wouldn’t completely ruin the trip. But it was not a just few days… Happy Money Series | How to Spend Well and Enjoy Your Money More  There's a personal finance cliché that has been running for decades: stop buying lattes, invest the money instead, and you'll retire with an extra $170,000. David Bach, a renowned financial author who coined "The Latte Factor," was not wrong in pointing out the massive effect of compound interest over a long period.
Skipping the morning coffee run can indeed save us thousands over the long run, but the argument fails to address an even larger problem. Buying a latte every single day costs more than a few dollars — it costs us the enjoyment of the treat itself! When that $6 coffee becomes an everyday habit, we slowly kill the dopamine boost that made it worth buying in the first place. From denial to acceptance: A guide to moving through the five stages of grief during an inflation shock.  I recently walk into a Chase Bank branch, which, yes, is still a sentence in 2026. The teller I was talking with has a family of 4. While discussing the astronomical cost of raising kids in this day and age, he jokingly said “Every time I leave the house, it costs me $200”. While I'm sure he was embellishing a bit, the statement rings true for a lot of Americans.
Gas is $5/gallon. A casual dinner out for two means $100 with tip. Movie theatre tickets are $20 each (before concessions), and you can forget getting a decent seat at a live sporting event. I mean I just bought a $30 polo from Target for goodness’ sake. What on earth happened? Sadly...the prices we knew are gone. The consumer price index has risen roughly 26% over the course of this decade¹. That's cumulative, and it's permanent. 5% inflation for services and healthcare. 3% inflation on goods. The sub 2% inflation of the 2010s is long gone. Around 46% of Americans in a recent Politico survey said the cost of living is worse than ever². YouGov has tracked inflation as Americans' most important issue every year since 2022³. What makes this dynamic even stranger: the economy, by most measures, is holding up. GDP grew 2% in 2025 despite everything thrown at it⁴. Unemployment has stayed near 4%. Private sector wages grew close to 4% year over year⁵. Leisure travel is booming. Many asset classes are hitting record highs. From a pure data standpoint, we should mostly feel better. But that’s just not the case. Americans are still intensely grieving the prices of the past, and unable to fully move on. The standard retirement calculator gives you a simple output and a false sense of certainty. The reality, hidden inside that 7% CAGR assumption, is a wide distribution of outcomes that can span millions of dollars. How timing luck can shape your retirement balance regardless of how well you saved.  Meet two retirees. We’ll name them Linda and Mark.
Linda retired at the end of 2008. Mark retired at the end of 1999. Both worked for 40 years. Both contributed the same amount to their 401(k)s. Both invested in a basic S&P 500 index fund. Neither panic-sold during crashes nor tried to time the market. They simply just invested their savings in their retirement accounts for the entire span of their careers. Linda finished with roughly $1.52M in today's dollars. Mark finished with roughly $4.97M. Same strategy, same discipline, same 40-year horizon, and a $3.45M gap between them. The only variable difference was the years they started and ended their careers. Now, go open any standard retirement calculator. Plug in their identical inputs: same contributions, same 40-year horizon, same 7% average assumed return. The calculator will spit out one number for both investors. It has no way of telling you that there is a wide range of outcomes somewhere between $1.52M and $4.97M, and that where you land inside that range is drastically attributable to the whims of the stock market. It's a structural problem with how retirement planning is oversimplified in its presentation. It only gets worse when you layer on what the behavioral research says about how people like Linda and Mark actually behave during their careers. The fear of running out of money often results in an overly conservative retirement plan. The flat-line spending model doesn't properly reflect the math behind a typical retirement spending glide path. Here's what the research suggests we do instead.  Open up almost any retirement planning tool, run a projection, and 99% of the time you’ll see a flat withdrawal rate (usually 4%) from 65 to 90, adjusted for inflation. It’s predictable and tidy.
It's also entirely oversimplified. The problem with the flat withdrawal rate is that it implies you, at 65, will have the same spending behavior as you at 85. Do you think you’ll have the same appetite for life, same desire to travel, same interest in a new car, same urge to go out for a drink at these vastly different ages? Probably not, right? Aging is dynamic. Every stage of life looks very different at its beginning versus its end. When your financial plan is built on a flat line, the math often tells you there's a crisis looming at 90 that demands significant restraint today. The result is a scarcity mindset that isn't entirely reflective of your evolving financial wants and needs.
A 5% market dip is one of the most normal events in investing. So why does it reliably send sentiment off a cliff?
Every market drawdown, you'll see the same red banner headline: “Stocks sell off as Wall Street worries about X”.
The S&P 500 drops 4–5% from a recent high, and the tone notably shifts. Pundits start talking about caution, allocations get “reassessed,” and risk becomes the focus. Scroll through investment forums and it sounds even worse: “Bear market incoming”. “Market is officially broken”. “The smart money got out weeks ago”. Somebody always has a thesis. What makes this so remarkable is how routine the trigger is. Since 1980, the S&P 500 has declined 5% or more in 93% of all calendar years.¹ These dips occur 4-5 times per year on average.² The event that sends investors into crisis mode is, statistically speaking, closer to a scheduled occurrence than a warning signal. Yet, sentiment data shows the same thing over and over: bearishness spikes quickly and sharply the moment one of these pullbacks arrives. Why do these dips always feel so worrying? Why is our emotional response so consistently out of proportion to what the data suggests? |
RSS Feed